What Ward did, and continues to do, to me is outlined in great detail on the Home Page and The Truth Page of this site. Ward also has plenty of supporters; people who, as we have seen, are willing to break the law to attack me instead of respond to my accusations. These ad hominem attacks are a continuation of the assault that started that terrible night in 1990 and aim to continue the pain and suffering I've already endured. And yet, I persist. And my feelings towards him are not just mine. Let's take a closer look at how people who have grown up with Ward feel about him. Let's dive a little deeper into how he handles himself when it comes to his responsibilities on various boards and councils and how he conducts his business. Of course, for the sake of privacy and so they aren't targeted like I have been, I have redacted names. But this sample is just a fraction of folks who do not defend the "boys will be boys", toxic townie culture that others seem to think is a pass for people that sexually assault inebriated high school girls.
The conflict of interest in being both the Melrose Representative to the Voke Tech Board and being on the Voke Tech Board.
...and true to his coWARDly nature, he doesn't deal with criticism head-on but instead reports the post to the admin of the group!
We also shouldn't forget that Ward lost is role with the Melrose Historical Commission for using their Facebook profile to sneak into another Facebook group that was opposing the change of the high school mascot so that he could spy on them.
Ward continually posts his campaign and official city council business on the Friends of Melrose Football Facebook page, a violation of the State and Federal Tax Code and puts the football program at risk of losing any revenue generated by the Friends of Melrose Football organization.
Ward is the owner of a company that:
a) is not registered with the Better Business Bureau so complaints can't be tracked.
b) has zero reviews on Yelp, Home Advisor, or Houzz.
c) has 8 reviews on Anji for an average of 2.9 out of 5 stars.
d) was sued by a client in 2021.
e) has had several small claims suits against him in the last 5 years.
f) has been sued by his insurance company.
It also appears this underhandedness/shadiness has been par for the course since high school:
